Skip to content

Port Comparison

All 11 priority ports side-by-side. Click column headers to sort.

Port Complex Tier Pollutants (t/yr) Exposed Population Est. Health Cost ($/yr) At-Berth Controls
Los Angeles / Long Beach CARB Regulated 3,200 1,500,000 Baseline (regulated) Yes — CARB
Oakland CARB Regulated 440 442,000 Baseline (regulated) Yes — CARB
New York / New Jersey Priority 1 2,600 3,200,000 $150M+ None
Houston / Galveston Priority 2 1,000 1,500,000 $100M+ None
New Orleans Priority 2 1,200 800,000 $70M+ None
Seattle / Tacoma Priority 2 900 600,000 $45M+ None
Savannah Priority 2 650 200,000 TBD None
Baltimore Priority 2 550 350,000 TBD None
Port Everglades Priority 3 400 180,000 TBD None
Jacksonville Priority 3 350 150,000 TBD None
Duluth-Superior Priority 3 250 55,000 $8M+ None

Sources: ICCT Port Emissions Screening (Sept 2024); Port Health Watch analysis using EPA methodology. Pollutant figures are combined criteria pollutants (PM2.5, NOx, SOx) at berth. Population figures represent below-median-income residents within the port impact zone.


Key Observations

The California gap is stark. The two CARB-regulated ports (LA/Long Beach and Oakland) have mandatory at-berth emissions controls. The remaining 9 priority ports — serving over 7 million below-median-income residents combined — have none.

Emissions don't correlate with regulation. New York/New Jersey emits more at-berth pollutants than Oakland but has zero mandatory controls. New Orleans emits nearly three times what Oakland does, with no regulation.

The technology exists. CARB-certified barge-mounted emissions capture systems achieving 99% PM2.5 and 95% NOx reduction are commercially deployed in California. The barrier is regulatory, not technological.

See the interactive map for a geographic view, or browse individual port assessments.